In her weekly briefing, Russian International Ministry spokeswoman Zakharova asks the “gents of Brussels and Lithuania” if Russia’s understanding is appropriate that “you may have unleashed a struggle?” Why does she should ask the query? Why not make a declarative assertion? https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/information/1819949/
Washington is brewing limitless issues for Russia. Washington bribed the president of Kazakhstan, whose nation Russia lately saved from a US sponsored colour revolution, to embarrass Putin on the St. Petersburg Worldwide Financial Discussion board by disagreeing with the Kremlin’s intervention in Donbass. US brokers are busy at work in Kazakhstan spreading concern that Kazakhstan is subsequent on Putin’s listing as he allegedly reconstructs the Soviet Empire. It’s Washington’s use of former Soviet provinces towards Russia that can lastly persuade Russia that the dismantling of the empire was a serious blunder because it created many new international locations that Washington can flip towards Russia.
Russia is in a really troublesome scenario, as a result of her political sophistication or realism is inadequate to assist her navy functionality. The Kremlin is at all times reactive, by no means proactive and doesn’t know the best way to defend Russia’s curiosity. One necessary motive the method is loaded towards Russia is that Washington has an expansionist ideology and Russia doesn’t. Washington is in pursuit of hegemony, and Russia simply desires to be a revered member of the world neighborhood.
That is inadequate ambition to cope with Washington’s neoconservatives who intend the destruction of Russia as a sovereign nation with ample energy to function a restraint on US unilateralism.
On June 30, Russian President Putin commented on NATO’s inclusion of Finland and Sweden: “We don’t have such issues with Sweden and Finland, which, sadly, we now have with Ukraine. We’ve got no territorial points and disputes. We’ve got nothing to fret about by way of Finland and Sweden’s membership in NATO. They need to be part of NATO – please. Solely they need to clearly know that there have been no threats to them earlier than, but when navy contingents and infrastructure are deployed there, we should reply in a mirror method.” https://southfront.org/turkey-agreed-to-sweden-and-finland-joining-nato-putin-is-not-against/
Putin’s acceptance of NATO on Russia’s border for an additional 832 miles is inconsistent with Russia’s protests of NATO on her borders. It’s inconsistent with Russia’s demand for mutual safety. The West sees Putin’s assertion as acceptance and weak spot. It is going to encourage extra provocations.